<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nod327.net &#187; admin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nod327.net/author/admin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nod327.net</link>
	<description>Here is fresh nod32 keys,Not windows 7 but nod327.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>[September 07,2010]Fresh nod32 keys</title>
		<link>http://www.nod327.net/2010/09/06/nod32-keys-3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nod327.net/2010/09/06/nod32-keys-3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NOD32 key]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nod327.net/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nod327.net/nod32-images/nod327.gif"></p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-34837623<br />
nod32key:3c6uvtc3fu</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-34837847<br />
nod32key:p35pd8d4ka</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-34837849<br />
nod32key:edj3csdf45</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-34837850<br />
nod32key:8ubr7upxch</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-34837854<br />
nod32key:6vr22a34t8</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-34837854<br />
nod32key:6vr22a34t8</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Username:TRIAL-33632565<br />
Password:n65jfv7mat</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33069522<br />
Password:2nx5fxpdhr</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33632568<br />
Password:82ckajfj25</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33632564<br />
Password:bxvch67ehd</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33632566<br />
Password:3ccpfp7t2a</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33632563<br />
Password:ff5mm4ux82</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33160270<br />
Password:3anjxndva2</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33160286<br />
Password:m3hkutavcs</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33160307<br />
Password:2bmjfhrh8n</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33160435<br />
Password:mv7bjap8m6</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33160462<br />
Password:f3xkr2ssr3</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-33160488<br />
Password:kt8f24v2e2</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-32871810<br />
nod32key:drvu38kv4p</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-32871881<br />
nod32key:fa357uxknm</p>
<p>Username:TRIAL-32871927<br />
nod32key:xcex2mjc8f</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nod327.net/2010/09/06/nod32-keys-3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESET Virus Signature Database Update 5358 may cause system slow-down issues</title>
		<link>http://www.nod327.net/2010/08/10/eset-virus-signature-database-update-5358-may-cause-system-slow-down-issues.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nod327.net/2010/08/10/eset-virus-signature-database-update-5358-may-cause-system-slow-down-issues.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 02:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NOD32 FAQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nod327.net/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>ESET is investigating a report of slow system usage on 64-bit database servers after Virus Signature Database Update 5358, released on August 11, 2010. While investigating the report, users were rolled back to an older module to bypass the issue. Virus Signature Database Update 5359 has been released to resolve this issue.</p>
<p>To learn how to update the Virus Signature Database of your ESET security product . After you have updated, verify that the <strong>Version of virus signature database</strong> reads <strong>5359 (20100811)</strong>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESET is investigating a report of slow system usage on 64-bit database servers after Virus Signature Database Update 5358, released on August 11, 2010. While investigating the report, users were rolled back to an older module to bypass the issue. Virus Signature Database Update 5359 has been released to resolve this issue.</p>
<p>To learn how to update the Virus Signature Database of your ESET security product . After you have updated, verify that the <strong>Version of virus signature database</strong> reads <strong>5359 (20100811)</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nod327.net/2010/08/10/eset-virus-signature-database-update-5358-may-cause-system-slow-down-issues.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which phones are compatible with ESET Mobile Antivirus?</title>
		<link>http://www.nod327.net/2010/08/09/which-phones-are-compatible-with-eset-mobile-antivirus.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nod327.net/2010/08/09/which-phones-are-compatible-with-eset-mobile-antivirus.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 02:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NOD32 FAQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nod327.net/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
ESET Mobile Antivirus is compatible with Microsoft Windows Mobile operating system versions 5.0, 6.0, and 6.1. Most devices that support these operating system versions will work with ESET Mobile Antivirus.
However, mobile devices supported by ESET Mobile Antivirus in unlocked default factory configuration may have compatibility issues when preloaded with software, reconfigured, or SIM-locked by specific [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="content">
<p>ESET Mobile Antivirus is compatible with Microsoft Windows Mobile operating system versions 5.0, 6.0, and 6.1. Most devices that support these operating system versions will work with ESET Mobile Antivirus.</p>
<p>However, mobile devices supported by ESET Mobile Antivirus in unlocked default factory configuration may have compatibility issues when preloaded with software, reconfigured, or SIM-locked by specific mobile service providers.</p>
<p>See below for a list of both compatible, and unsupported devices for ESET Mobile Antivirus:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Tested Compatible Devices</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>HP iPAQ 116 PDA</li>
<li>HTC Advantage</li>
<li>HTC Faraday (Cingular 2125)*</li>
<li>HTC Touch (Verizon XV6900)</li>
<li>HTC Touch Pro (AT&amp;T Fuze)</li>
<li>HTC TyTN (Cingular 8525)</li>
<li>HTC TyTN II (AT&amp;T Tilt)</li>
<li>Palm Treo 750</li>
<li>Pantech Duo*</li>
<li>Samsung BlackJack II*</li>
<li>Samsung SGH-i900 Omnia*</li>
<li>Sony Xperia X1*</li>
<li>UTStarcom XV6700 (Verizon XV6700)</li>
<li>XDA Atom Life</li>
</ul>
<p>*Tested on unlocked device</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Unsupported Devices</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Asus MyPal A696 PDA</li>
<li>iMate SPL (as S101 &#8211; PhoneOne, Thailand)</li>
<li>Samsung Blackjack (as BlackJack &#8211; AT&amp;T, US)</li>
<li>Samsung SGH-i900 Omnia (as Player Addict &#8211; SFR, France)</li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nod327.net/2010/08/09/which-phones-are-compatible-with-eset-mobile-antivirus.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
